Rehau Geneo vs Euro 70: which to choose

Rehau Geneo vs Euro 70: which to choose

Summary

• Rehau Geneo uses RAU‑FIPRO composite, 86 mm frame depth, excellent thermal performance.
• Euro 70 is a 70 mm conventional uPVC profile with steel reinforcement, more budget‑friendly.
• Geneo gives better insulation and reduced thermal bridges; Euro 70 is a reliable economical choice.
• Glass unit choice and professional installation are as important as the profile.
• Geneo pays off faster in cold climates through lower heating costs.
• For typical apartment replacement Euro 70 is often sufficient; choose Geneo for retrofit energy upgrades.

Introduction

When choosing new PVC windows, selecting the right profile is crucial. Rehau Geneo and Euro 70 represent two different approaches: a high‑performance modern system and a proven cost‑effective solution. This guide compares their construction, insulation, durability, cost and helps you decide based on needs and budget.

Structure and materials

• Rehau Geneo: approx. 86 mm profile depth, unique RAU‑FIPRO composite reinforcement which allows the frame to perform without steel inserts. Designed to accept large, multi‑chamber glazing units and often paired with triple glazing.
• Euro 70: 70 mm profile depth, conventional design with steel reinforcement. Typically a 3‑chamber profile suitable for standard double or triple glazing units.

Thermal and acoustic performance

• Geneo outperforms in thermal insulation thanks to its deeper frame and absence of steel thermal bridges. It helps lower heat loss significantly.
• Euro 70 offers decent insulation but cannot match the energy efficiency of Geneo under identical glazing.
• Acoustic insulation largely depends on the glass unit and mounting quality; Geneo provides better synergy with thick multilayer glazing.

Strength and longevity

• RAU‑FIPRO gives Geneo high rigidity and stability without steel, reducing deformation risks over time.
• Euro 70 with steel reinforcement is durable for typical window sizes; for large spans, proper armature and installation are essential.

Energy savings and cost

• Geneo has a higher upfront cost but leads to long‑term energy savings, especially in colder regions.
• Euro 70 is more affordable initially; combining it with a high‑performance glass package and precision installation can still yield good results.

Appearance and options

• Both systems come in multiple colours and finishes. Geneo appears visually more substantial because of the wider frame.
• Standard fittings and options (micro‑ventilation, tilt&turn, concealed hinges) are available for both profiles.

Recommendations

• Choose Rehau Geneo if your priority is maximum thermal performance and long‑term savings.
• Choose Euro 70 if you need a reliable, cost‑effective replacement for a standard apartment and must stay within a tighter budget.
• Never skimp on installation quality and sealing — poor mounting will negate profile advantages.

FAQ

1. What is the main technical difference?

Geneo uses a composite RAU‑FIPRO reinforcement and 86 mm depth, reducing thermal bridges. Euro 70 is a 70 mm profile with steel reinforcement.

2. Is Geneo worth the extra cost?

Yes, if you live in a cold climate or plan an energy‑efficient renovation. The energy savings over years can offset the higher initial price.

3. Can Euro 70 be used in cold regions?

Yes, but choose a good triple glazing and ensure professional installation. Geneo will still perform better thermally.

4. How much does glazing matter?

Greatly. A high‑quality triple glazed unit reduces heat loss and noise significantly regardless of the profile.

5. What maintenance is required?

Periodic lubrication of hinges, cleaning drainage channels, and checking seals. Both profiles need similar routine care.

6. What should I not save on?

Do not save on mounting, sealing and accurate measurements — these have the biggest impact on window performance.

Need a quote or on‑site measurement in Latvia? Contact DK‑Logi for a detailed calculation and professional installation options.